Civic organizations have refused the ICCJ's invitation to dialogue, considering that the process is a legitimization, not a real consultation, and that not all critical voices are included.

Several civic organizations have refused the invitation to dialogue from the High Court of Cassation and Justice (ÎCCJ), accusing a lack of transparency in the selection of participants and the fact that not all critical voices in society are represented. The NGOs state that the initiative seems more like a legitimization than a real consultation and emphasize that the ÎCCJ does not have the institutional mandate to initiate such dialogues.

They respect the constitutional role of the court, but believe that the invitation was addressed to a restricted group, without clear selection criteria, which raises questions about the legitimacy of the dialogue. The organizations mention that an authentic dialogue requires transparency and accountability, and the recent context of the judicial system does not provide guarantees for a credible discussion. They remain open to a real dialogue but emphasize that their participation cannot take place under conditions of opacity and controlled selection.