The Judicial Inspection contradicts the documentary "Recorder": The accusations are unfounded, highlighting omissions and subjective interpretations.

None of the accusations presented in the material from the journalists at Recorder, Captured Justice, regarding alleged influences on the solutions pronounced in corruption cases are factually confirmed, states a report from the Judicial Inspection following the completion of the investigation. According to the magistrates, the Recorder documentary contains omissions and situations described selectively and subjectively, writes Mediafax.

The Judicial Inspection has completed the verifications regarding the accusations in the 'Recorder' documentary, concluding that they are not confirmed.

"The claims in the Recorder material regarding the expiration date of the statute of limitations are factually incorrect: as shown, the statute of limitations had already expired in 2017, and not in 2024, as incorrectly claimed to justify the narrative. Furthermore, the analysis of the administrative acts attests that the changes made to the panels of judges were determined by objective reasons and were made in accordance with legal and regulatory provisions," the report states.

The Inspection emphasizes that the independence of judges should not be confused with the freedom to act arbitrarily. Additionally, the report mentions that public attacks against judges, especially from some prosecutors, have contributed to the erosion of trust in justice. In conclusion, the Judicial Inspection asserts that there is no evidence to support the accusations in the 'Recorder' material, which has amplified an already existing discourse about influencing justice.