search icon
search icon
Flag Arrow Down
Română
Română
Magyar
Magyar
English
English
Français
Français
Deutsch
Deutsch
Italiano
Italiano
Español
Español
Русский
Русский
日本語
日本語
中国人
中国人

Change Language

arrow down
  • Română
    Română
  • Magyar
    Magyar
  • English
    English
  • Français
    Français
  • Deutsch
    Deutsch
  • Italiano
    Italiano
  • Español
    Español
  • Русский
    Русский
  • 日本語
    日本語
  • 中国人
    中国人
Sections
  • News
  • Exclusive
  • INSCOP Surveys
  • Podcast
  • EU
  • Diaspora
  • Republic of Moldova
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Current Affairs
  • International
  • Sport
  • Health
  • Education
  • IT&C knowledge
  • Arts & Lifestyle
  • Opinions
  • Elections 2025
  • Environment
About Us
Contact
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions
Quickly scroll through news digests and see how they are covered in different publications!
  • News
  • Exclusive
    • INSCOP Surveys
    • Podcast
    • EU
    • Diaspora
    • Republic of Moldova
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • Current Affairs
    • International
    • Sport
    • Health
    • Education
    • IT&C knowledge
    • Arts & Lifestyle
    • Opinions
    • Elections 2025
    • Environment
130 new news items in the last 24 hours
  1. Home
  2. EU

The commission is investigating whether the Saipem–Subsea7 merger would leave only one comparable rival for large submarine projects.

Liviu Brăteanu
whatsapp
facebook
linkedin
x
copy-link copy-link
22 July 2026, 17:15
main event image
EU
areporter/ Shutterstock.com
google-preference

Always see our news on Google

The European Commission has opened an in-depth investigation into the merger between Saipem and Subsea7, after a preliminary assessment indicated that the operation could significantly reduce competition for some of the most complex underwater infrastructure projects. The two companies intend to form Saipem7, but the transaction cannot be completed in the notified form without the authorization of the competition authorities.

In short, the Commission is primarily checking the market for SURF services, which cover the pipelines, cables, and other underwater installations through which offshore rigs are connected to surface production facilities. Saipem and Subsea7 are two of the three major global providers of such services. The Commission preliminarily considers that, after the merger, there would remain only one comparable competitor, while the other providers are smaller and have more limited capacities. Clients may have fewer alternatives for complex oil, gas, and carbon capture and storage projects. The investigation will check whether this situation could lead to higher prices or reduced innovation. The Commission will also analyze the installation of export pipelines, the decommissioning of offshore infrastructure, and the possible effects produced by the presence of the resulting group in several related markets. The transaction was notified on June 16, 2026. The Commission has 90 working days, until November 26, to make a decision, and the opening of the in-depth investigation does not pre-determine its outcome.

The main concern regards the services known as SURF, an acronym for the pipelines and cables that connect oil and gas rigs to the production facilities above the sea surface. These systems include pipelines through which hydrocarbons flow, control cables, and other components installed on or near the seabed, sometimes at depths of thousands of meters.

Companies competing for these contracts must be able to design, produce, transport, and install the infrastructure, using specialized vessels and teams capable of working in technically challenging conditions. The Commission preliminarily considers that the necessary investments are very high, the available capacity is limited, and the entry or expansion of new competitors is difficult.

Saipem and Subsea7 compete closely, especially for the most complex and profitable projects. Both are among the three main global suppliers, and the resulting company would hold a high share of both the market and the available capacity for executing projects.

According to the preliminary assessment, after the merger, there would remain only one supplier with comparable capacity. The other identified competitors are considerably smaller and do not seem able to compete to the same extent for all categories of projects, especially for large-scale works that require the most sophisticated vessels.

The clients of the two companies are largely large and experienced groups from the oil and gas sector. The Commission will check whether they would have sufficient alternatives to counteract any price increases following the reduction in the number of suppliers capable of taking on the most difficult contracts.

The investigation will also cover carbon capture and storage projects. These involve collecting carbon dioxide produced by industrial facilities or power plants, transporting it through pipelines, and permanently storing it in geological formations, including beneath the seabed. The infrastructure development currently uses vessels, equipment, and skills similar to those required for offshore oil and gas projects.

The Commission will analyze whether the reduction in competition could lead to higher prices and less innovation, without currently considering these effects as certain outcomes of the merger. The assessment will also check whether the remaining suppliers could more easily reach and coordinate their behavior in a market with fewer participants.

The control will be extended to services for large-diameter underwater pipelines that transport production to shore or to other facilities and to the decommissioning of obsolete offshore infrastructure. These activities may require the same vessels and capacities used for installing equipment, allowing companies to compete in multiple related markets.

The Commission will also examine whether the resulting group could use its position in one activity to limit competition in another. The investigation seeks possible vertical effects, which occur between different levels of a supply chain, as well as conglomerate effects produced by combining related services.

The initial assessment did not identify the same issues across all activities of the companies. The Commission considers that the offerings of Saipem and Subsea7 are largely complementary in offshore wind projects and in some conventional offshore projects, but will continue to verify whether the transaction creates difficulties in the related SURF services markets.

Saipem is an Italian engineering and construction company for energy infrastructure, active in onshore and offshore projects. Subsea7 is based in Luxembourg, is listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange, and specializes in the engineering and installation of underwater infrastructure. Both work on oil and gas projects, offshore wind energy, and carbon capture and storage.

The merger is to be realized through the absorption of Subsea7 by Saipem, which would be renamed Saipem7. The resulting company would remain registered in Italy, headquartered in Milan, and would be listed on the Milan and Oslo stock exchanges. The current shareholders of each company would hold 50% of the capital, assuming the participation of all Subsea7 shareholders in the operation.

Saipem and Subsea7 signed the binding merger agreement in July 2025, and Saipem's shareholders approved the cross-border plan in September of the same year. The companies estimated that the resulting group would have annual revenues of approximately 21 billion euros, an order book of 43 billion euros, and annual savings of approximately 300 million euros after integrating operations. These figures are estimates by the companies regarding the resulting group and not conclusions of the Commission on the effects of the transaction.

The Commission analyzes mergers that exceed the revenue thresholds set by European regulations to determine whether they would significantly impede competition in the European Economic Area or in a significant part of it. Most transactions are approved after the initial check, while an in-depth investigation is opened when there are doubts that cannot be resolved at the first stage.

The opening of the second phase does not mean that the merger will be blocked. During the investigation, the Commission may request additional documents and data, consult clients and competitors, and analyze any solutions proposed by the companies to eliminate the identified issues.

Until November 26, 2026, the Commission may approve the transaction unconditionally, authorize it with obligations or commitments that reduce risks to competition, or prohibit it if it concludes that the issues cannot be remedied. The timeline may be modified under the conditions provided by the European merger control procedure.

Sources

sursa imagine
2eu
Comisia investighează dacă fuziunea Saipem–Subsea7 ar lăsa un singur rival comparabil pentru marile proiecte submarine

Latest News

20:28

Lionel Messi donated 80,000 euros for the reconstruction of the Sierra Oeste area near Madrid, devastated by fires.

20:16

UN: Acute child malnutrition reaches alarming levels in Afghanistan

20:00

Spider-Man: Brand New Day generated $1.05 billion in the first six days, becoming the second fastest grossing film after Avengers: Endgame

19:50

Timișoara and Oradea reduce public lighting to save energy

19:50

ISU Buzău intervenes to extinguish a wildfire in the commune of Podgoria, affecting 20 hectares

See more news

NEWS ON THE SAME TOPICS

event image
EU
The Commission wants less bureaucracy for companies checked for subsidies received from outside the European Union.
event image
EU
Temu risks a fine of up to 1% of its turnover for possible obstruction of a European inspection
event image
EU
XXXLutz and Porta, investigate because they might have started the takeover before the Commission's approval.
event image
EU
The European Commission is investigating Sanofi for the possible disparagement of a rival flu vaccine intended for vulnerable patients.
event image
EU
The Commission checks whether Spain can pay the compensation of 23.5 million euros granted to an investor in renewable energy.
event image
EU
Paramount can buy Warner in the EU, but must give up the joint distribution of films with Universal
app preview
Personalized news feed, AI-powered search, and notifications in a more interactive experience.
app preview app preview
European Commission Saipem–Subsea7 submarine projects

Editor’s Recommendations

main event image
Exclusive
2 hours ago

ANALYSIS Gianni Infantino and the front of discontent: can the head of FIFA be shaken?

main event image
Current Affairs
8 hours ago

The Bucharest Court of Appeal suspended the Bolojan Government's regulations regarding the suspension of licenses for drivers with unpaid fines, at the request of the PSD.

Sources
imagine sursa
imagine sursa
imagine sursa
main event image
Exclusive
8 hours ago

EXCLUSIVE Romania, Trump and the new Atlantic equation: how much is the bet on a single man worth

main event image
Exclusive
10 hours ago
Original Content

August 4, 2026. TV: What was discussed last night on the news channels

app preview
Personalized news feed, AI-powered search, and notifications in a more interactive experience.
app preview
app store badge google play badge
  • News
  • Exclusive
  • INSCOP Surveys
  • Podcast
  • EU
  • Diaspora
  • Republic of Moldova
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Current Affairs
  • International
  • Sport
  • Health
  • Education
  • IT&C knowledge
  • Arts & Lifestyle
  • Opinions
  • Elections 2025
  • Environment
  • About Us
  • Contact
Privacy policy
Cookies Policy
Terms and conditions
Open source licenses
All rights reserved Strategic Media Team SRL

Technology in partnership with

anpc-sal anpc-sol