The CCR declared unconstitutional a series of provisions from the Law on territorial planning and urbanism.

According to a statement from the CCR, the constitutional judges, with unanimous votes, accepted the exception of unconstitutionality and found that the provisions of art.32 first thesis of Law no.350/2001 regarding territorial planning and urbanism, in the wording prior to the amendment by art. I point 6 of Law 289/2006 for the amendment and completion of Law no.350/2001 regarding territorial planning and urbanism, are unconstitutional.

The Constitutional Court established that the provisions, which allowed local public authorities to approve deviations from existing urban planning documentation without establishing objective criteria or clear guarantees, do not meet the quality requirements of the law provided by art.1 para. (5) of the Constitution and affect the principles of predictability and legal security.