The European Commission has appointed a Scientific Group and an Advisory Forum that will support the implementation of the Regulation on artificial intelligence, particularly through technical expertise for the European Office for Artificial Intelligence and national authorities.
In short
The European Commission has appointed two advisory bodies for the implementation of the Regulation on artificial intelligence. The Scientific Group includes 60 independent experts with experience in frontier artificial intelligence, engineering, technical auditing, industry, and social impact. The Scientific Group will focus on general-purpose artificial intelligence models and systems, systemic risks, model classification, assessment methods, and cross-border market oversight. The Advisory Forum will provide technical expertise on standardization, rule application, and practical implementation challenges. The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, and standardization bodies will have a permanent role in the forum.
For citizens and companies, the appointment of these bodies matters because the Regulation on artificial intelligence is entering a stage where rules must be interpreted, applied, and practically overseen. Artificial intelligence is already used in digital services, administration, health, education, recruitment, cybersecurity, industry, and consumer products, and the coherent application of the rules will depend on specialized technical expertise.
The Scientific Group brings together 60 independent experts, selected for their experience in areas such as frontier artificial intelligence, engineering, technical auditing, industry, and social impact. Its role is to support the European Office for Artificial Intelligence and national authorities in the implementation of the Regulation on artificial intelligence.
A central point of the Scientific Group's activity will be the oversight of general-purpose artificial intelligence models and systems, known as GPAI. These models can be integrated into numerous services and applications and can produce effects across multiple sectors, making it difficult to assess risks at the level of a single company or a single member state.
The group will provide expertise on systemic risks, model classification, assessment methodologies, and cross-border market oversight. These topics are important for the uniform application of rules in the European Union, especially when an AI model or system is developed in one country, integrated into digital services in another, and used by citizens or companies across the entire single market.
The Advisory Forum will have a broader role. It will provide technical expertise and recommendations regarding the application of the Regulation on artificial intelligence, including in areas such as standardization and implementation challenges. Its members come from academia, civil society, and industry, including small and medium-sized enterprises and startups.
The selection of forum members also aims for gender and geographical balance, as well as a combination of competencies, including expertise in AI literacy, general-purpose artificial intelligence models, and the sectors covered by the regulation. This structure should allow for a broader analysis of the effects of the rules, not only from the perspective of large technology companies but also from the perspective of research, fundamental rights, smaller enterprises, and users.
Several European agencies and bodies will have a permanent role in the Advisory Forum. Among them are the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights and the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, ENISA, as well as standardization bodies. Their presence reflects the connection between artificial intelligence, fundamental rights, cybersecurity, and technical standards.
The mandate of the members is for two years. The two bodies are part of the governance architecture of the Regulation on artificial intelligence, alongside the European Office for Artificial Intelligence, the European Council for Artificial Intelligence, and national authorities. The European Commission describes this structure as a multi-actor governance mechanism intended to support a balanced application of the regulation.
The Regulation on artificial intelligence is the legal framework of the European Union for AI systems and general-purpose artificial intelligence models. The European Commission and the authorities of the member states are responsible for its implementation, oversight, and enforcement. The European Office for Artificial Intelligence, the European Council for Artificial Intelligence, the Scientific Group, and the Advisory Forum form the institutional structure through which the European Union seeks to transform the adopted rules into effective control over the AI market.
In short
The European Commission has appointed two advisory bodies for the implementation of the Regulation on artificial intelligence. The Scientific Group includes 60 independent experts with experience in frontier artificial intelligence, engineering, technical auditing, industry, and social impact. The Scientific Group will focus on general-purpose artificial intelligence models and systems, systemic risks, model classification, assessment methods, and cross-border market oversight. The Advisory Forum will provide technical expertise on standardization, rule application, and practical implementation challenges. The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, and standardization bodies will have a permanent role in the forum.
For citizens and companies, the appointment of these bodies matters because the Regulation on artificial intelligence is entering a stage where rules must be interpreted, applied, and practically overseen. Artificial intelligence is already used in digital services, administration, health, education, recruitment, cybersecurity, industry, and consumer products, and the coherent application of the rules will depend on specialized technical expertise.
The Scientific Group brings together 60 independent experts, selected for their experience in areas such as frontier artificial intelligence, engineering, technical auditing, industry, and social impact. Its role is to support the European Office for Artificial Intelligence and national authorities in the implementation of the Regulation on artificial intelligence.
A central point of the Scientific Group's activity will be the oversight of general-purpose artificial intelligence models and systems, known as GPAI. These models can be integrated into numerous services and applications and can produce effects across multiple sectors, making it difficult to assess risks at the level of a single company or a single member state.
The group will provide expertise on systemic risks, model classification, assessment methodologies, and cross-border market oversight. These topics are important for the uniform application of rules in the European Union, especially when an AI model or system is developed in one country, integrated into digital services in another, and used by citizens or companies across the entire single market.
The Advisory Forum will have a broader role. It will provide technical expertise and recommendations regarding the application of the Regulation on artificial intelligence, including in areas such as standardization and implementation challenges. Its members come from academia, civil society, and industry, including small and medium-sized enterprises and startups.
The selection of forum members also aims for gender and geographical balance, as well as a combination of competencies, including expertise in AI literacy, general-purpose artificial intelligence models, and the sectors covered by the regulation. This structure should allow for a broader analysis of the effects of the rules, not only from the perspective of large technology companies but also from the perspective of research, fundamental rights, smaller enterprises, and users.
Several European agencies and bodies will have a permanent role in the Advisory Forum. Among them are the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights and the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, ENISA, as well as standardization bodies. Their presence reflects the connection between artificial intelligence, fundamental rights, cybersecurity, and technical standards.
The mandate of the members is for two years. The two bodies are part of the governance architecture of the Regulation on artificial intelligence, alongside the European Office for Artificial Intelligence, the European Council for Artificial Intelligence, and national authorities. The European Commission describes this structure as a multi-actor governance mechanism intended to support a balanced application of the regulation.
The Regulation on artificial intelligence is the legal framework of the European Union for AI systems and general-purpose artificial intelligence models. The European Commission and the authorities of the member states are responsible for its implementation, oversight, and enforcement. The European Office for Artificial Intelligence, the European Council for Artificial Intelligence, the Scientific Group, and the Advisory Forum form the institutional structure through which the European Union seeks to transform the adopted rules into effective control over the AI market.
Latest News
23:21
The option of a technocratic government could return to the negotiating table. Ciprian Ciucu: "The President would have tested one or two, three options, but I was not told what those options are."
22:53
The President of Brazil, Lula da Silva, is launching his campaign for a fourth term / He declares himself to be "in excellent shape" at the age of 80.
22:17
Radu Miruță: "It is a complicated situation, a situation that is merely the consequence of poor management of the balance between electricity production and consumption / Romania, for years, has only shut down"
21:50
Fire on a ferry in Indonesia, off the coast of Madura Island: Five people have died and 41 are missing.
21:26
Superliga: Corvinul Hunedoara and Sepsi finished in a draw, 1-1
See more news