In just a few days, the name Oana Gheorghiu has become one of the most frequently mentioned in the Romanian online space. The sentiment analysis conducted with the help of the media and social media monitoring platform NewsVibe highlights a strongly negative component in the overall tone of the public debate, but this polarization is more related to the intensity of the arguments and the confrontational language used by supporters and critics, rather than the perception of the debate's protagonist, who remains predominantly associated with positive messages and contexts.
THE VOLUME OF CONVERSATION. In the last few days, there have been almost 1700 online mentions of Oana Gheorghiu in relevant Romanian sources, monitored and processed with the help of NewsVibe.
THE ESTIMATED IMPACT of these mentions has reached nearly 28 million potential views.

NewsVibe Chart. The evolution of the number of mentions about Oana Gheorghiu, as well as the total impact of these mentions, in the last week
HOW IS THE TOPIC DEBATED ONLINE? The NewsVibe sentiment analysis, based on a high-accuracy AI linguistic processing engine, automatically evaluates the tone of the online reflection of the topic – which is strongly emotional (the percentage of only 70% neutral mentions illustrates a disputed subject).
In the area of online content with emotional charge, the discourse is dominated by a negative attitude – a double percentage compared to the positive attitude. This trend does not necessarily reflect the attitude towards Oana Gheorghiu, but shows that the debate has a high level of intensity, with confrontational and vehement language used by both sides – both supporters and opponents.
At the level of comparisons between platforms, a more pronounced negative sentiment score is observed on YouTube and the web, and more tempered on Facebook.

NewsVibe Chart. The automatic evaluation of the tone of the online conversation about Oana Gheorghiu in the last week
WHAT ARE THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE SENTIMENT VECTORS? The sentiment analysis at the entity level, which highlights the vectors behind the positive or negative tone, shows that the name Oana Gheorghiu predominantly appears in favorable contexts, with a ratio of approximately 3 to 1 between positive and negative mentions.
In the area of associations in an appreciative register, entities associated with her NGO activities stand out first (Asociația Dăruiește Viață, the Children's Cancer Hospital, Carmen Uscatu), but also connections with the political world, such as Ilie Bolojan – who nominated her for the governmental role, or USR leader Dominic Fritz.
Terms present in a negative context are dominated by the name Donald Trump – the new Deputy Prime Minister's older post about the American president being the motivation for attacks against Oana Gheorghiu, as well as Sorin Grindeanu, the PSD leader who called for the withdrawal of her nomination.

NewsVibe Chart. Top entities mentioned in a positive context (in green) or negative (in red) in the online conversation about Oana Gheorghiu, in the last week
THE SEMANTIC ARCHITECTURE OF THE DEBATE. The dynamics of the debate is even clearer when we analyze its semantic map, which shows the connections between actors and subjects based on how they have been mentioned in the online environment. The configuration of this map highlights two distinct camps: one pro, significantly larger, formed around Oana Gheorghiu's achievements and the support received from the Prime Minister and the President's confirmation, and one anti, dominated by Sorin Grindeanu, PSD, and the theme that triggered critical reactions – the protagonist's attitude towards Donald Trump.

NewsVibe Chart. The semantic network of the online conversation about Oana Gheorghiu, in the last week
Overall, the analysis shows that the topic has quickly surpassed the realm of a simple political controversy, becoming a catalyst for public debate, where emotions, symbols, and political affiliation have intertwined in a strongly polarized digital landscape.