UNESCO study: Romanians and Americans see artificial intelligence as a risk for elections, but consider it more trustworthy than traditional institutions.

In the UNESCO World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development 2025 report, Dan Sultănescu, research director at CPD SNSPA, coordinated a comparative study on citizens' perceptions regarding artificial intelligence (AI) in four countries: Mexico, Romania, South Africa, and the United States.

The study, conducted in collaboration with the University of South Carolina, showed that although 97% of respondents are familiar with AI, concerns vary significantly. In Romania and the USA, the risks of misinformation and electoral manipulation are more pronounced, while Mexico and South Africa are more concerned about the economic impact of AI but are more optimistic regarding its democratic potential. A surprising aspect is that AI tools are considered more trustworthy than traditional institutions. Respondents supported a combination of self-regulation of technology companies and public oversight, with strong support from Romanians and Americans for government intervention.

Sultănescu emphasizes that AI has become an influential force in everyday life, affecting how citizens consume information and perceive truth. The study's results, presented at the Bucharest Security Conference, highlight the need for transparent governance and international cooperation to ensure that AI supports democracy.